Why Doesn't Class Conflict Dominate Politics in Advanced Industrial Societies?
View Paper
ESSAY DETAILS
Words: 1861
Pages: 7
(approximately 235 words/page)
Pages: 7
(approximately 235 words/page)
Essay Database > History > European History
In his work, "The Distribution of Power Within the Political Community: Class, Status, Party", Max Weber gives a very detailed description of how society works within its classes, status groups and parties. All communities are arranged in a way where goods from different type, tangible and intangible, symbolic and material are distributed. Thus, such distribution is always unequal and necessarily involves power. As Weber explains, " 'classes', 'status groups', and 'parties' are phenomena of the distribution
showed first 75 words of 1861 total
Sign up for EssayTask and enjoy a huge collection of student essays, term papers and research papers. Improve your grade with our unique database!
showed first 75 words of 1861 total
showed last 75 words of 1861 total
explains, " 'classes', 'status groups', and 'parties' are phenomena of the distribution of power within a community" (Webber, 207). Given this information we can easily provide an answer to the question why class conflict does not have a dominant function in the politics of advanced industrial societies. The distribution of power depicts a stable backbone for the support and provision of the classes, thus they seize to create conflicts, but establish social mobility among the classes instead.
explains, " 'classes', 'status groups', and 'parties' are phenomena of the distribution of power within a community" (Webber, 207). Given this information we can easily provide an answer to the question why class conflict does not have a dominant function in the politics of advanced industrial societies. The distribution of power depicts a stable backbone for the support and provision of the classes, thus they seize to create conflicts, but establish social mobility among the classes instead.