Thomas Jefferson and James Madison's views on the interpretation of the Constitution (DBQ)
View Paper
ESSAY DETAILS
Words: 599
Pages: 2
(approximately 235 words/page)
Pages: 2
(approximately 235 words/page)
Essay Database > History > North American History
The general consensus among historians is that there was a difference of opinions between Thomas Jefferson and James Madison on the policies of the interpretation of the Constitution. It is generally believed that Thomas Jefferson felt that there should be strict and inflexible interpretation of the Constitution, while James Madison felt that the Constitution was elastic and that many different laws could be derived form a single clause. Their views, however, seemed to have switched
showed first 75 words of 599 total
Sign up for EssayTask and enjoy a huge collection of student essays, term papers and research papers. Improve your grade with our unique database!
showed first 75 words of 599 total
showed last 75 words of 599 total
as strict constructionists and James Madison and the Federalists as broad interpreters was true, but not for the entire sixteen years between 1801 and 1817. In the beginning of Jefferson's presidency, each had those views. Towards the end of it, however, their beliefs switched, and this was evident in the way that Jefferson ended up believing that change was good and how Madison refused to stray from the powers given to the Federal Government by the Constitution.
as strict constructionists and James Madison and the Federalists as broad interpreters was true, but not for the entire sixteen years between 1801 and 1817. In the beginning of Jefferson's presidency, each had those views. Towards the end of it, however, their beliefs switched, and this was evident in the way that Jefferson ended up believing that change was good and how Madison refused to stray from the powers given to the Federal Government by the Constitution.