The Immorality of Taking the Future from a Person: The cons of abortion based on the ideas that a fetus has potential for a future.
View Paper
ESSAY DETAILS
Words: 2493
Pages: 9
(approximately 235 words/page)
Pages: 9
(approximately 235 words/page)
Essay Database > Law & Government
Abortion is one of the oldest controversies the United States' political systems and society have faced. There is no black and white area of this topic because many different angles by which a person can analyze the issues have been developed over the years. It is my personal belief that abortion is immoral. Based on the ideas that a fetus has potential for a future (Marquis, 1989) and that a fetus is a person, based on …
showed first 75 words of 2493 total
Sign up for EssayTask and enjoy a huge collection of student essays, term papers and research papers. Improve your grade with our unique database!
showed first 75 words of 2493 total
showed last 75 words of 2493 total
…New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Hinman, L. M. (2000). Contemporary Moral Issues: Diversity and Consensus (pp. 36-38). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Lerner, G. (2004). CNN. "Court hears challenges to let-term abortion ban", Retrieved 12/10/04, from http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/06/22/late.term.abortion/index.html Marquis, D. (1989). "Why abortion is immoral". In Hinman, L.M. Contemporary Moral Issues: Diversity and Consensus (pp 60-79). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Thomson, J.J. "A Defense of Abortion." Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1971): 47-66.
…New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Hinman, L. M. (2000). Contemporary Moral Issues: Diversity and Consensus (pp. 36-38). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Lerner, G. (2004). CNN. "Court hears challenges to let-term abortion ban", Retrieved 12/10/04, from http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/06/22/late.term.abortion/index.html Marquis, D. (1989). "Why abortion is immoral". In Hinman, L.M. Contemporary Moral Issues: Diversity and Consensus (pp 60-79). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Thomson, J.J. "A Defense of Abortion." Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1971): 47-66.
