Legal cases: possible claim against Australian manufacturers of the Waist Waster and Myways supermarkets for negligence and breach of contract
View Paper
ESSAY DETAILS
Words: 1616
Pages: 6
(approximately 235 words/page)
Pages: 6
(approximately 235 words/page)
Essay Database > Business & Economy
Question 2.
Buck Spumante might have claims against the Australian manufacturers of the Waist Waster and Myways supermarkets in this matter under these possible actions.
(A). Possible claims against Australian manufacturers of the Waist Waster
1. Negligence
To identify whether Australian manufacturers of the Waist Waster is liable for the tort of negligence, we have to establish the following:
a. Duty of care
To prove that the duty of care exist, following tests need to be established
showed first 75 words of 1616 total
Sign up for EssayTask and enjoy a huge collection of student essays, term papers and research papers. Improve your grade with our unique database!
showed first 75 words of 1616 total
showed last 75 words of 1616 total
New Ferry Co v Robertson that based on pat dealings with Buck, it has made the exclusion clause valid. And also under the rules of Parker v South Eastern Railway that the exclusion clause is of reasonable notice which made it valid. If any of the above two rules can be proved and justified then the exclusion clause will be valid and Buck will not be able to claim losses under negligence of Myways Supermarket.
New Ferry Co v Robertson that based on pat dealings with Buck, it has made the exclusion clause valid. And also under the rules of Parker v South Eastern Railway that the exclusion clause is of reasonable notice which made it valid. If any of the above two rules can be proved and justified then the exclusion clause will be valid and Buck will not be able to claim losses under negligence of Myways Supermarket.