Is Microsoft A Monopoly
View Paper
ESSAY DETAILS
Words: 1570
Pages: 6
(approximately 235 words/page)
Pages: 6
(approximately 235 words/page)
Essay Database > Law & Government > Government & Politics
America's century-old antitrust law is increasingly irrelevant to our modern global information technology market. This law is obsolete, in accordance to the current Microsoft situation, because in the past there wasn't technology as there is now. Recently the government has been accusing Microsoft as being a monopoly. "Techno-Optimists" claim that "efforts by government to promote competition by restraining high-tech firms that acquire market power will only stifle competition." Some analysts disagree. They concede that dynamic
showed first 75 words of 1570 total
Sign up for EssayTask and enjoy a huge collection of student essays, term papers and research papers. Improve your grade with our unique database!
showed first 75 words of 1570 total
showed last 75 words of 1570 total
p. B1. 2. Gates, Bill., "Why the Justice Department Is Wrong," The Wall Street Journal, November 10, 1997, p. A22. 3. Moore, James F., "U.S. v. Microsoft: The Bigger Question," New York Times, January 25, 1998, p. 12-BU. 4. Train, Kenneth E., Optimal Regulation : The Economic Theory of Natural Monopoly, October 1991, p231-45 5. Wollenberg, Keith K., "An Economic Analysis of Tie-In Sales: Re-Examining the Leverage Theory," Stanford Law Review 39 (1987): 737, 755-56 6. "Microsoft Under Attack, but Who Is It Hurting?" USA Today, October 23, 1997
p. B1. 2. Gates, Bill., "Why the Justice Department Is Wrong," The Wall Street Journal, November 10, 1997, p. A22. 3. Moore, James F., "U.S. v. Microsoft: The Bigger Question," New York Times, January 25, 1998, p. 12-BU. 4. Train, Kenneth E., Optimal Regulation : The Economic Theory of Natural Monopoly, October 1991, p231-45 5. Wollenberg, Keith K., "An Economic Analysis of Tie-In Sales: Re-Examining the Leverage Theory," Stanford Law Review 39 (1987): 737, 755-56 6. "Microsoft Under Attack, but Who Is It Hurting?" USA Today, October 23, 1997