The question of whether the discipline of International Relations (IR) was in the past, and is still now, a predominantly American social science, is one that has taken up a great deal of discourse in the field of IR. Indeed this question has been the driving force for the IR theory course for which this paper was written; as evidenced by the title and content of the course textbook at the very least (International Relations …
showed first 75 words of 2744 total

showed last 75 words of 2744 total
…York Press. 2001. Hoffman, Stanley. "An American Social Science: International Relations." Daedalus: American Academy of Arts and Sciences. 106 (3), 41-60. 1977. Holsti, Kalevi J. Dividing Discipline: Hegemony & Diversity in International Theory. <Tab/>Boston: Allen and Unwin. 1985. Nossal, Richard Kim. "Tales that Textbooks Tell: Ethnocentricity and Diversity in American Introductions to International Relations." Paper presented to the biennial meetings of the Association for Canadian Studies in Australia and New Zealand Macquarie University. July 1998.