Fahrenheit 9/11 seems to have either enraged or enlightened anyone who watched it, depending on where his or her biases lie. Steve Rhodes wrote in his review that the documentary is only filled of "half-truths" to make everyone see Moore's skewed point of view on Bush's presidency. Fitraks and Wasserman, from free press journal are outraged at how the documentary can be seen as containing these so called "half truths", feeling that facts mentioned throughout the …
showed first 75 words of 1081 total

showed last 75 words of 1081 total
…while Fitrakis and Wasserman brought up facts that Moore could have incorporated in the film further incriminating the president. LaSalle was the only one out of the three able to keep personal feelings regarding the president and Moore out of his review, concentrating on the true value of the film as a whole. Whether the film does or doesn't stand with their beliefs, movie critics should be able to perceive the worth of a film.