There are almost as many different kinds of computer art as there are of traditional art. An obvious distinction, specific for the discipline, can be made by the amount of artist-interaction that is involved. The software used is my own. I developed and implemented a dedicated 3D language based on what I call 'Domain Oriented Programming'. I made my images strictly by programming in this language. There is no tactile interaction involved and no use …
showed first 75 words of 497 total

showed last 75 words of 497 total
…log of wood and legitimately present this as a work of art. So I think Computer Art needs no special criteria to be judged. As with any form of Art, we have to look at the quality of the product combined with the intentions of the creator(s). What I tried to justify above is that there always will be at least one person who can be called the creator in a widened sense.