Empirical adequacy, logical consistence, and personal relevance are three simple tests that can be used to prove truth. When applied to a situation that involves a death row prisoner who has found God, the result may not be so simple. The complicating factor in this situation is the motive of the inmate and if he is using the attachment to God as a means. The evidence that supports a person on death row, who claims …
showed first 75 words of 460 total

showed last 75 words of 460 total
…out by this person. The newfound adoration of religion is negated. After applying the tests to prove truth and the philosophies of different respected philosophers, it is imperative to consider the viewpoint of the review board and those involved directly in making this decision. Regardless if the inmate has found God or not, there are more considerable factors involved. Until these controversial factors can be resolved, the death row inmate should get a commuted sentence.