Australian Law Assignment Question: The test in Australia has been applied as a two part test, one of foreseeability and proximity. Discuss the elements of the law of negligence highlighting recent developments. Table of Cases Cited Cases Cited Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 Chapman v Hearse (1962) 106 CLR 112 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932} AC 562 Hill v Van Erp (1997) 71 ALJR 487 Jaensch v Coffey (1984) 115 CLR 549 Nagle v Rottnest Island Authority (1993) 177 CLR 423 Perre v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) 164 ALR 606 Pyrenees Shires …
showed first 75 words of 2357 total

showed last 75 words of 2357 total
…Erp (1997) 71 ALJR 487 *Jaensch v Coffey (1984) 115 CLR 549 *M Gorton, (2000) Surgery, Ethics and the Law. Melbourne: Blackwell Science Asia *Nagle v Rottnest Island Authority (1993) 177 CLR 423 *Perre v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) 164 ALR 606 *Pyrenees Shires Council v Day (1998) 192 CLR 330 *State of Victoria v Richards [1998] VSCA 103 *Sullivan v Moody (2001) 75 ALJR 1570 *Thomson v Connon (2000) 183 ALR 404 *Tony Scott (2002). Beware of obvious risk - is the tide turning against plaintiff? Retrieved September 29, 2003 from http://www.mcmahons.com.au/wpc/main.phpo?SID=6 Endnotes