This article shows the opposing views of columnists Beth Quinn and Douglas Cunningham on the 2004 Presidential Election. While Quinn makes very good points supporting Senator John Kerry and the democrats, Cunningham argues those points supporting President George W. Bush and the republicans. Both writers practically use mudslinging to gain the readers' support for each presidential candidate. Quinn's column, Election Primer for Undecideds, endorses Senator Kerry by pointing out the errors of the president's ways. She …
showed first 75 words of 407 total

showed last 75 words of 407 total
…Kerry-supporter if he stood strong on his views and appeared reliable. So, in conclusion, I find myself leaning more towards Bush. I wish I could have a say in this election. Even though Beth Quinn and Douglas Cunningham disagreed completely on the candidates, they ended their columns the same way they wanted the reader to choose. I found it quite funny that after all the persuasion, all the mudslinging; they'd expect the reader to choose.