The movie and the book Interview with the Vampire were alike in few ways, but different in to many to count. The movie was supposed to be a close representation of the book. In the beginning of the movie Ann Rice said that it was one of her favorites and was close to what she had expected. I thought that it was a mockery of it. It was leaving out so many details. It got …
showed first 75 words of 553 total

showed last 75 words of 553 total
…that Lestat was the dad and that was how he got her back for him, but in the movie she just "was there". I could go on like this for quite a few pages longer except it is all pretty much the same thing. Like the coffins being the wrong shape and so on, but you get the idea. In conclusion I thought that the book was exceptional and the movie just sucked in comparison.