A Critique of Valls’ Interpretation of Just War Theory
View Paper
ESSAY DETAILS
Words: 1166
Pages: 4
(approximately 235 words/page)
Pages: 4
(approximately 235 words/page)
Essay Database > Law & Government > Government & Politics
showed first 75 words of 1166 total
showed last 75 words of 1166 total
they must be very precise in their targeting. It can be concluded that the argument that Valls presents is sound and defensible. However it must be stated that the overwhelming majority of acts committed by nonstate groups fail to meet the stringent requirements of just war theory, especially discrimination. Finally it can be argued that most wars do not satisfy just war requirements, especially if one dismisses the morality of the principle of double effect.
they must be very precise in their targeting. It can be concluded that the argument that Valls presents is sound and defensible. However it must be stated that the overwhelming majority of acts committed by nonstate groups fail to meet the stringent requirements of just war theory, especially discrimination. Finally it can be argued that most wars do not satisfy just war requirements, especially if one dismisses the morality of the principle of double effect.